4.5 Article

Effects of drilling parameters on delamination of kenaf-glass fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL TEXTILES
卷 51, 期 2_SUPPL, 页码 3057S-3076S

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15280837211062053

关键词

Delamination; machining parameters; hybrid; taguchi analysis; analysis of variance

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research/Iraq
  2. UniKL Malaysian Institute of Industrial Technology (MITEC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drilling is a process of material removal, but problems may arise when drilling composite materials due to delamination. This study examined the effect of factors such as feed rate, spindle speed, drill bit type, and geometry on delamination during the drilling process, and used Taguchi methods to find the optimal parameters.Minimizing delamination was achieved when using a feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev and a spindle speed of 700r/min with both types of drill bits.
Drilling is a secondary material removal and usually carried out to facilitate fastening of parts together. Drilling of composite materials is not usually a problem-free process. Issues related to delamination composite laminates need to be addressed because it introduces the stress concentration point on the composite. This study focussed on the influence of process parameters such as spindle speed, feed rate, type of drill bits and geometry on the extend of delamination experienced by the composite during the drilling process of kenaf-glass fibre-reinforced unsaturated polyester composite, and the delamination measurements were taken under a microscope. Taguchi methods and analysis of variance were employed to find the optimal parameters. From the results, the most significant parameter was the feed rate. The minimum delamination was achieved when the feed rate was 0.05 mm/rev and spindle speed was 700r/min using both types of drill bits. The quality of the drill hole using the twist drill bit has been proven to be better than the brad drill bit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据