4.7 Article

CO2 separation from biogas using PEI-modified crosslinked polymethacrylate resin sorbent

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2021.07.038

关键词

Biomethane; Biogas; CO2 adsorption; Zwitterion mechanism; Economic assessment

资金

  1. Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully separated CO2 from biogas using PEI-modified resins, demonstrating high adsorption capacity and stability. Economic feasibility analysis shows that PEI-impregnated resins are more cost-effective than traditional upgrading technologies.
The separation of CO2 from biogas to achieve vehicle/pipeline grade methane is an expensive step. Recently, PEI (polyethyleneimine) impregnated resins have been proposed and evaluated for CO2 separation from flue gases and air. However, its use in biogas upgrading and evaluation of the economic feasibility of such adsorbents have not been explored in detail. In this work, by modifying an inert polymeric resin (HP2MGL) using PEI, CO2 was separated from biogas. The sorbent exhibited the highest adsorption capacity of 2.7 mmol(CO2)/g(ads) at 30% PEI loading, increasing to 2.9 mmol(CO2)/g(ads) in the presence of moisture, and remained stable for up to five adsorption-desorption cycles. In situ DRIFTS studies showed that CO2 adsorption on PEI-impregnated sorbent is consistent with the zwitterion reaction mechanism, and the sorbent could be regenerated completely at 100 degrees C. The upgrading cost of biogas is primarily dominated by the operating cost of regeneration and the adsorbent cost. The economic feasibility analysis suggests that PEI-impregnated resin sorbent requires less capital and operating costs than conventional biogas upgrading technologies. Therefore, PEI-impregnated polymeric resins are promising for CO2 separation from biogas. (C) 2021 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据