4.7 Article

Spatial and temporal variability evaluation of sediment yield and sub-basins/hydrologic response units prioritization on Genale Basin, Ethiopia

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 603, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127190

关键词

SWAT; Sediment yield; SDR; Sensitivity; Watershed; Prioritizing critical HMIs/sub-basins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Erosion of topsoil is a significant global environmental issue, especially impacting agricultural and upland areas. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model is utilized to simulate streamflow, sediment load, and identify spatial and temporal variability in sediment yield, helping prioritize areas for erosion management. Analysis revealed substantial variations in sediment yield among sub-basins, emphasizing the importance of targeted erosion control measures.
Erosion of the topsoil is a serious environmental problem worldwide that critically alarms agricultural and upland areas. Most wetlands, rivers, and reservoirs are losing their capacity because of sediment deposition into the water body from the upstream of watersheds, as they were not managed. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model is used to simulate streamflow, sediment load, & identify spatiotemporal variability of the sediment yield and sediment delivery ratio (SDR), point out erosion-prone area, and prioritize sub-basins/hydrologic response units (HRUs) for management. The model is implemented by utilizing a digital elevation model, land use, soil type, and slope of the Genale basin; 464 HRUs were created, spreading over 25 sub-basins within the drainage area 54,942Km(2) . SUFI 2 algorithm of SWAT calibration & uncertainty programs (SWAT_CUP) is used to calibrate (1990 - 2005) and validated (2006 - 2013) streamflow & sediment on monthly scale, and the resulted statistics are; R-2 = 0.87, 0.85 and NSE = 0.81, 0.78 for flow calibration and validation respectively whereas R-2 = 0.84, 0.82 and NSE = 0.79, 0.75 for sediment calibration and validation respectively. Significant spatiotemporal variability of sediment yield was observed in the watershed, as the characteristics of the terrain, land use, & soil type in each sub-basin varies. Among the total 25 sub-basins, three sub-basins produced a very high sediment rate (21-31 ton/ha/year), one produced high (16-20 ton/ha/year), one is moderate (11-15 ton/ha/year), three were low (6-10 ton/ha/year), and the rest 16 sub-basins were under very low categories. In the case of SDR, three sub-basins have very high SDR (>0.452), two sub-basins resulted in high SDR (0.326-0.451), which are located at the upland basin. Based on the model results, sub-basins 6, 8, 12, 10, and 7 were identified as sediment-prone areas. Further investigation at the HRUs scale is taken to understand critical erosion areas and minimize the cost of management practice, time & human resources. HRU analysis has revealed the immense scope of minimizing cost by concentrating management measures only in the critical HRUs. For example, Sub-basin-6 has 31 HRUs, of which only seven are assessed to have the high rates of sediment yield and thus prioritized as; HRU-159, HRU-160, HRU-161, HRU-168, HRU-170, and HRU-171, which are located on agricultural and arable lands of steep slopes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据