4.7 Article

Prediction of estuarine water quality using interpretable machine learning approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 605, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127320

关键词

Ammonia nitrogen prediction; Machine learning; Shapely additive explanations; Xiaoqing River estuary

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1906215, 41731280]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estuaries are major sources of pollution in coastal areas, and estuarine water quality prediction models can provide early warnings to prevent disasters. This study developed machine learning models to predict NH4+-N in the Xiaoqing River estuary, China, finding a strong nonlinear relationship between estuarine NH4+-N and NH4+-N of the upper reaches. The explanations from the model highlighted the critical impact of two monitoring stations in the upper reaches on estuarine water quality.
Estuaries are principal sources of pollution in coastal areas. Estuarine water quality prediction models can provide early warnings to prevent major disasters in coastal ecosystems. In this study, several machine learning models-multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were developed to predict NH4+-N in the Xiaoqing River estuary, China. The results show that there is a strong nonlinear relationship between estuarine NH4+-N and NH4+-N of the upper reaches. The shapely additive explanations method was used to interpret the XGBoost model and discover the influence of the upper reaches of the river on the estuary. These explanations showed that two stations monitoring water quality in the upper reaches (Shicun and Sanchakou) had a critical impact on estuarine water quality. If NH4+-N concentration of the upper reaches is below 2 mg/L, estuarine NH4+-N would not be negatively influenced by the upper reaches. These results can support pollution warnings for improving estuarine water quality and the integrated environmental management of the river and costal area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据