4.7 Article

Large-scale flash flood warning in China using deep learning

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 604, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127222

关键词

Flash flood warning; Deep learning; Mountainous and hilly areas; China

资金

  1. National Key Research and Devel-opment Program of China [2019YFC1510605]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42101086, U1865102, 52109046]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Heibei Province-Key Technology Research [19275403D]
  4. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin [SKL2020TS01]
  5. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFC3001000]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  7. Sun Yat-sen University [2021qntd15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposed a deep learning-based approach for flash flood warning in mountainous and hilly areas of China, outperforming traditional methods and showing better results when considering spatial features and long time series of precipitation. The approach provided reliable flash flood warnings, particularly when used in conjunction with ensemble results to mitigate uncertainty caused by small or unbalanced learning samples.
Flash flood warning (FFW) systems play a fundamental role in flood hazard prevention and mitigation. In this study, we propose the first deep learning-based approach for large-scale FFW and demonstrate the application of this approach to mountainous and hilly areas of China. Specifically, the time series of precipitation before flash floods and three spatial features (maximum daily precipitation, curve number, and slope) are selected as predictors. A long short-term memory (LSTM)-based approach is adopted to predict the occurrence of flash floods, and we compare this approach with two widely used FFW methods, namely the rainfall triggering index (RTI) and flash flood guidance (FFG). The results demonstrate the following: (1) The LSTM-based approach provided a reliable FFW 1 day ahead with a hit rate (HR) of 0.84 and false alarm rate (FAR) of 0.09. It demonstrated moderate warning performance 2 days before flash floods, with an HR of 0.66 and FAR of 0.21. (2) The LSTMbased approach outperformed the benchmark RTI and FFG methods, achieving the highest critical success index (CSI) of 0.77. The FFG also provided satisfactory performance, with a CSI of 0.71, and the RTI demonstrated the lowest performance (CSI = 0.68). (3) The LSTM-based approach provides better results (CSI = 0.75) than RTI (CSI = 0.68) when only the time series of precipitation is used for prediction. The performance of the LSTMbased approach can be improved by considering the spatial features and a long time series of precipitation during model development. (4) The proposed approach did not exacerbate the effect of precipitation uncertainty on the flash flood warning; and we suggest using ensemble results for FFW to reduce the uncertainty caused by small or unbalanced learning samples. We conclude that the proposed approach is a valid method for large-scale FFW without using commercially sensitive observations, and can improve the capabilities of flood disaster mitigation, particularly in ungauged areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据