4.7 Article

The evaluation of deep groundwater recharge in fractured aquifer using distributed fiber-Bragg-grating (FBG) temperature sensors

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 601, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126645

关键词

Fractured rocks; Temperature monitoring; FBG sensors; Deep groundwater recharge; Taiwan

资金

  1. Central Geological Survey, Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) of Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studying temperature-depth variation data using FBG sensors provides insights into groundwater flow dynamics in multilayered fractured formations.
On the assessment of groundwater potentiality in aquifers, a better understanding of the recharge patterns and flow pathways at the deeper depth is required but remains difficult. By studying the long-term temperature-depth variation data derived from using fiber-Bragg-grating (FBG) sensors, the objective of the present research is to discuss and demonstrate how this technique can provide information on the groundwater flow dynamics in a multilayered fractured formation. A series of borehole geophysical tests were first conducted to enable the characterization of the geological features and the presence of fracture flow. An array of 12 FBG sensors is deployed at multiple predetermined screening depths after well construction has completed, and the temperature-depth (T-z) trend line was established by fitting a polynomial curve to all the data points. The obtained temperature gradients in the upper depth of 5-80 m were found to be convex upward from January to April, uniform from May to July, and concave upward from August to December, which reveals a trend that the subsurface flow pattern actually varied throughout the year. In other words, groundwater recharge is not always a continuous steady-state process, a significant time delay between rainfall and its substantial contribution to the aquifer as a form of deep groundwater recharge may take place and needs to be systematically investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据