4.2 Article

Proteomic Distributions in CD34+Microvascular Niche Patterns of Glioblastoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 99-110

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1369/00221554211058098

关键词

angiogenesis; glioblastoma; MALDI-imaging MS; microvascular; prognosis; stem cell; stemness; tumor heterogeneity; tumor microenvironment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21435002]
  2. Professor Fund of Fujian Medical University [JS15006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the protein distributions in MVNPs using CD34 immunofluorescence staining and MALDI-IMS technology, finding that MVNPs could be divided into two types and were associated with the prognosis of GBM. The findings may assist future research on therapy for GBM and predict prognosis.
The poor clinical prognosis and microvascular patterns of glioblastoma (GBM) are of serious concern to many clinicians and researchers. However, very few studies have examined the correlation between microvascular niche patterns (MVNPs) and proteomic distribution. In this study, CD34 immunofluorescence staining and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-IMS) technology were used to investigate the protein distributions in MVNPs. CD34+ microvascular phenotype could be divided into four types: microvascular sprouting (MS), vascular cluster (VC), vascular garland (VG), and glomeruloid vascular proliferation (GVP). Based on such characteristics, MVNPs were divided into two types by cluster analysis, namely, type I, comprising primarily MS and VC, and type II, comprising many VGs and GVPs. Survival analysis indicated the type of MVNPs to be an independent prognostic factor for progression-free and overall survival in GBM. MALDI-IMS results showed the peaks at m/z 1037 and 8960 to exhibit stronger ion signals in type II, while those at m/z 3240 and 3265 exhibited stronger ion signals in type I. The findings may assist future research on therapy and help predict prognosis in GBM. However, due to the limited number of studies, more well-designed studies are warranted to further verify our results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据