4.4 Article

Marijuana liberalization policies and perinatal health

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102537

关键词

Medical marijuana laws; Recreational marijuana laws; Pregnant women; Neonatal health

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [P30DA040500, K01DA051777]
  2. Gerber Foundation [GF192350]
  3. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [RWJF77962]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the implementation of recreational marijuana laws led to an increase in the proportion of pregnant women with marijuana use disorder and a decrease in hospitalizations for tobacco use disorder, with no significant impact on newborn health. State medical marijuana laws did not have a significant effect on maternal substance use disorder hospitalizations or newborn health. Overall, the study concluded that marijuana liberalization policies had modest or no adverse effects on perinatal outcomes.
We studied the effect of marijuana liberalization policies on perinatal health with a multiperiod difference-in-differences estimator that exploited variation in effective dates of medical marijuana laws (MML) and recreational marijuana laws (RML). We found that the proportion of maternal hospitalizations with marijuana use disorder increased by 23% (0.3 percentage points) in the first three years after RML implementation, with larger effects in states authorizing commercial sales of marijuana. This growth was accompanied by a 7% (0.4 percentage points) decline in tobacco use disorder hospitalizations, yielding a net zero effect over all substance use disorder hospitalizations. RMLs were not associated with statistically significant changes in newborn health. MMLs had no statistically significant effect on maternal substance use disorder hospitalizations nor on newborn health and fairly small effects could be ruled out. In absolute numbers, our findings implied modest or no adverse effects of marijuana liberalization policies on the array of perinatal outcomes considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据