4.7 Article

The effective removal of Congo Red using a bio-nanocluster: Fe3O4 nanoclusters modified bacteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 424, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127577

关键词

Bacteria; Fe3O4 nanoclusters; Congo Red; Adsorption characteristics; Adsorption mechanism

资金

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2018MD018]
  2. Yantai University Doctoral Start-up Foundation [HX2018B32]
  3. Shandong Key Laboratory of Marine Ecological Restoration [201919]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A bio-nanocluster (Fe3O4@bacteria) was successfully prepared and utilized for the removal of Congo red (CR) contamination from water resources. The maximum adsorption capacity for CR dye was found to be significantly higher compared to Fe3O4 alone. The adsorption process was described by the Langmuir isotherm theory and pseudo-first-order model, and was found to be spontaneous and exothermic according to the thermodynamic parameters.
A bio-nanocluster (Fe3O4@bacteria) was prepared by simply mixture using the bacterial suspension and Fe3O4 nanoclusters to remove Congo red (CR) contamination from water resources. The bio-nanocluster was characterized by SEM, TEM and XPS. Adsorption efficiency, adsorption process and adsorption mechanism were comprehensively investigated. The maximum adsorption capacity (Q(m)) of CR dye onto the Fe3O4@bacteria peaked at 320.1 mg/g, which was 2.88 times that of Fe3O4 under the same condition. Based on the equilibrium and kinetic studies, the Langmuir isotherm theory and pseudo-first-order model is appropriate to describe the adsorption process. The adsorption of CR is spontaneous and exothermic according to the thermodynamics parameters (Delta G(theta), Delta H-theta and Delta S-theta). The adsorption force dominated the Van der Waals force, biofloculation and chemisorption. The Fe3O4@bacteria could be applied potentially as an absorbent with high efficiency and environmentally friendly remediation of dyeing wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据