4.7 Article

Multiple pollutants stress the coastal ecosystem with climate and anthropogenic drivers

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 424, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127570

关键词

Coastal Pollution; Land-based activity; Coastal ecosystem; Climatic zone; Ecological risk

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42030707, 71761147001]
  2. National Key R & D Program of China [2019YFC0507505, 2017YFC0505704]
  3. International Partnership Program by the Chinese Academy of Sciences [121311KYSB20190029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the Yangtze River delivers the highest loads of pollutants to the seas, and the spatial distribution of pollutants is influenced by the increasing latitudinal gradient, showing a cold-trapping effect in soil concentrations. Metal pollution poses high ecological risks to coastal ecosystems, and the ecological risks for protected species vary depending on different priority pollutants.
Coastal ecosystem health is of vital importance to human well-being. Field investigations of major pollutants along the whole coast of China were carried out to explore associations between coastal development activities and pollutant inputs. Measurements of target pollutants such as PFAAs and PAHs uncovered notable levels in small estuary rivers. The Yangtze River was identified to deliver the highest loads of these pollutants to the seas as a divide for the spatial distribution of pollutant compositions. Soil concentrations of the volatile and semi-volatile pollutants showed a cold-trapping effect in pace with increasing latitudinal gradient. The coastal ecosystem is facing high ecological risks from metal pollution, especially copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn), while pri-ority pollutants of high risks vary for different kinds of protected species, and the ecological risks were influenced by both climate and physicochemical properties of environmental matrices, which should be emphasized to protect and restore coastal ecosystem functioning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据