4.7 Article

Green conversion of hazardous red mud into diagnostic X-ray shielding tiles

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 424, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127507

关键词

Red Mud; X-ray Shielding tiles; Hazardous waste; X-ray attenuation; Circular economy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully converted iron-rich red mud into diagnostic X-ray shielding tiles by adding barium sulfate and binders, demonstrating sufficient impact strength and flexural strength suitable for wall applications. The red mud tiles were found to possess attenuation equivalent to lead at certain x-ray voltages, with minimal leaching of heavy elements, making them a safer alternative to toxic lead sheets for protecting against radiation hazards in medical settings.
Red mud is a solid hazardous alumina industrial waste, which is rich in iron, titanium, aluminum, silicon, calcium, etc. The red mud contains 30-60% of hematite, which is suitable for shielding high energy X- and gamma rays. So, the iron rich red mud was converted into diagnostic X-ray shielding tiles through ceramic route by adding a certain weight percentage of BaSO4 and binders (kaolin clay or sodium hexametaphosphate) with it. The kaolin clay tile possess sufficient impact strength (failure point is 852 mm for 19 mm steel ball) and flexural strength of similar to 25 N/mm(2), which is suitable for wall applications. The 10.3 mm and 14.7 mm thick red mud:BaSO4: kaolin clay tile possess the attenuation equivalent to 2 mm and 2.3 mm lead at 125 kVp and 140 kVp, respectively. No heavy elements were found to leach out except chromium and arsenic from the sintered tiles. However, the leaching of Cr (0.6 ppm) and As (0.015 ppm) was found to be well below the permissible limit. These tiles can be used in the X-ray diagnosis, CT scanner, bone densitometry, and cath labs instead of toxic lead sheet and thereby to protect the operating personnel, public, and environment from radiation hazards.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据