4.7 Article

Enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by 16% Er3+-Bi2WO6 photocatalyst

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 422, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126920

关键词

Bismuth tungstate; Erbium; Photocatalytic degradation; Tetracycline

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21767024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new Er3+-mixed Bi2WO6 photocatalyst was successfully prepared and demonstrated to efficiently degrade tetracycline pollutants under visible light irradiation. The catalyst showed promising characteristics for environmental purification applications and proposed a photocatalytic degradation system and pathway for tetracycline pollutants.
The widespread use of antibiotics in drug therapy and agriculture has seriously polluted the aquatic environ -ment. Bismuth tungstate (Bi2WO6) is a new and efficient visible-light catalyst that is simple to prepare, non-toxic, stable, and corrosion resistant. Nonetheless, its efficiency has remained limited, and erbium (Er) mixing has been tested to address this. Here, a new Er3+-mixed Bi2WO6 photocatalyst was successfully prepared through the one-step hydrothermal method; pigments were characterized via XRD, SEM, BET, XPS, Uv-vis, PL and EIS. The results showed that the 16% Er3+-Bi2WO6 photocatalyst is a 250 nm flower-like nanosheet with a specific surface area of 67.1 m(2)/g and bandgap (Eg) of 2.35 eV, which provides the basis for superior performance. When the con-centration of the catalyst was 0.4 g/L, 94.58% of the tetracycline (TC) solution (initial concentration of 10 mg/L) degraded within 60 min under visible light irradiation (lambda >= 420 nm). ESR and LC-MS were used to identify the free radicals and intermediates for the degradation of TC pollutants; a photocatalytic degradation system and pathway were proposed. This solar-driven system will ultimately reduce resource consumption, providing a sustainable and energy-saving environmental decontamination strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据