4.7 Article

Short-term exposure to ambient air pollution and risk of daily hospital admissions for anxiety in China: A multicity study

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 424, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127535

关键词

Air pollution; Anxiety; Hospital admissions; Nitrogen dioxide; Sulfur dioxide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82073509]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0211600, 2017YFC0211601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found significant associations between short-term exposure to ambient NO2 and SO2 and the risk of daily hospital admissions for anxiety, especially in the southern region and patients under 65 years old.
The potential impact of short-term exposure to ambient air pollution on risk of anxiety remains uncertain. We performed a detailed evaluation based on data from national insurance databases in China. Daily hospital admissions for anxiety disorders were identified in 2013-2017 from the national insurance databases covering up to 261 million urban residents in 56 cities in China. A two-stage time-series study was conducted to evaluate the associations between short-term exposure to major ambient air pollutants, including fine particles, inhalable particles, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone, and carbon monoxide, and risk of daily hospital admissions for anxiety. Significant associations between short-term exposures to ambient NO2 and SO2 and risk of daily hospital admissions for anxiety were found in the overall analysis. Per 10 mu g/m(3) increases in NO2 at lag0 and SO2 at lag6 were associated with significant increases of 1.37% (95% CI: 0.14%, 2.62%) and 1.53% (95% CI: 0.59%, 2.48%) in anxiety admissions, respectively. Stronger associations were found in the southern region and patients <65 years for SO2. Short-term exposure to ambient air pollution is associated with increased risk of anxiety admissions, which may provide important implications for promotion of mental health in the public.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据