期刊
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 424, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127478
关键词
Raman imaging; Matrix-assisted laser desorption; ionisation-mass spectrometry; Microplastics; Marker ink; Algorithm
The study developed and compared two methods for microplastic analysis, Raman imaging and MALDI-MS. Both techniques have benefits and limitations, and it is generally recommended to use them in combination, especially for samples with strong background interference.
The characterisation of microplastics is still a challenge, particularly when the sample is a mixture with a complex background, such as an ink mark on paper. To address this challenge, we developed and compared two approaches, (i) Raman imaging, combined with logic-based and principal component analysis (PCA)-based algorithms, and (ii) matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS). We found that, accordingly, (i) if the Raman signal of plastics is identifiable and not completely shielded by the background, Raman imaging can extract the plastic signals and visualise their distribution directly, with the help of a logicbased or PCA-based algorithm, via the fingerprint spectrum; (ii) when the Raman signal is shielded and masked by the background, MALDI-MS can effectively capture and identify the plastic polymer, via the barcode of the mass spectrum linked with the monomer. Overall, both Raman imaging and MALDI-MS have benefits and limitations for microplastic analysis; if accessible, the combined use of these two techniques is generally recommended, especially when assessing samples with strong background interference.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据