4.5 Article

Association between Preoperative Steroids and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 1198-1204

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05260-w

关键词

Glucocorticoids; Pancreatic surgery; Complications; Pancreatic fistula

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used a national database to analyze the association between preoperative steroid use and outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The study found that the use of steroids was not associated with the incidence of postoperative complications, delayed gastric emptying, and pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing this surgery.
Background A national study analyzing the association between preoperative steroid use and outcomes after pancreatic resections is lacking. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between preoperative steroids and outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy using a national database. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2014-2019). In addition, we utilized propensity score matching to compare patients on preoperative steroids to those who were not. Outcomes measured included 30-day complications and mortality, need for readmission, a prolonged hospital length of stay, delayed gastric emptying, and pancreatic fistula. Results After propensity score matching, there were 438 patients in the steroid group and 876 patients in the no steroid group. There was no difference in pancreatic fistula (23.8% vs. 21.7%; p-0.3), delayed gastric emptying (21.1% vs.20.1%; p-0.06), major complications (31.8% vs. 30.1%; p-0.1), and mortality (3.5% vs. 3.2%; p-0.6) between the two groups. Conclusion Glucocorticoids did not reduce the incidence of overall complications, postoperative fistula, and delayed gastric emptying following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据