4.4 Article

Efficacy of Selected Powdered Floor Treatments against Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Listeria Monocytogenes on Polyurethane-Concrete Flooring Material Carriers

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
卷 85, 期 5, 页码 871-878

出版社

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/JFP-21-413

关键词

Antimicrobial; Floor treatment; Food processing; Hygiene; Pathogens

资金

  1. Tyson Foods, Inc., Fayetteville, AR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food processing environment flooring can be contaminated with pathogens, but the use of natural antimicrobial turmeric and commercially available powdered floor treatments can reduce the levels of pathogens on the floor. In this study, the effectiveness of these chemicals against Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria monocytogenes was evaluated. The results showed that treatments containing percarbonate-based commercial floor treatment were more effective, while turmeric alone was less effective. The combination of turmeric and percarbonate treatment did not show higher effectiveness than the commercial treatment alone at a lower recommended application rate.
Food processing environment flooring can become contaminated with pathogens in many ways, including foot and equipment traffic, incoming materials, and floor drain backups. Natural antimicrobial turmeric and commercially available powdered floor treatments may reduce the levels of pathogens on flooring, thereby reducing the risk of cross-contamination from the floor to food contact surfaces. These chemicals were evaluated to determine their effectiveness against cocktails of Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes dried onto the surfaces of carriers made from polyurethane-concrete commercial flooring material. Aqueous test solutions, diluted in sterile water, were prepared from the minimum treatment required per square meter from the manufacturer's instructions. Potential synergy between turmeric and a percarbonate-based commercial floor treatment was explored with a mixture of turmeric and sodium percarbonate (SPC), each at approximately 37 g/m - application rate. Each inoculated carrier was exposed to the treatment solutions or a sterile water control for 10 min at room temperature and neutralized with HiCap Neutralizing Broth; the bacteria were suspended and enumerated, and log reductions calculated for each treatment and inoculum combination. Mean log CFU per carrier reductions with standard deviations ranged between 4.29 +/- 0.34 for the SPC-based treatment and 0.004 +/- 0.23 for turmeric for Salmonella, 4.81 +/- 0.16 for SPC-based treatment and -0.16 +/- 0.62 for turmeric for E coli, and 4.88 +/- 0.6 for SPC-based treatment and -0.16 +/- 0.15 for turmeric for L. monocytogenes. The results support that among the treatments tested, those containing SPC were more effective, turmeric alone was less effective, and a percarbonate treatment containing turmeric was not more effective than the conunercial treatment alone at half the recommended application rate against the organisms tested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据