4.4 Article

Development of intermediate-moisture apricot with impregnation of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30 6086 as a functional snack: Quality assessment during storage

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.16348

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ege University Scientific Research Program (BAP) [FBG--2020--22500]
  2. Izmir, Turkey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to develop an apricot snack with impregnation of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30 6086 spores and investigate the changes in quality during the storage at 4 degrees C. The results showed that probiotic apricots with higher probiotic viability after processing and storage were successfully produced by VI while maintaining better quality and sensory characteristics.
The aim of this study was to develop an apricot snack with impregnation of Bacillus coagulans GBI-30 6086 spores and investigate the changes in quality during the storage at 4 degrees C. Thus, dried apricots were impregnated with B. coagulans until they reached the intermediate moisture level (36%). The probiotic impregnation was conducted under the atmospheric pressure (control) and VI applied (experimental). The results showed the B. coagulans count of the apricots remained stable (>7 log CFU/g) over 42 days at +4 degrees C. The TSS, pH, acidity, total phenolic content (TPC), and hardness were similar for both groups on the 0th day. The TPC of the experimental group was 10.7% higher than the control at the end of storage (p < .05). Finally, the probiotic apricot with higher probiotic viability after processing and storage were successfully produced by VI while decreasing the process time by 74.2%, and maintaining better quality and sensory characteristics. Novelty impact statement Bacillus coagulans GBI-30 6086 spores were impregnated into organic dried apricots by vacuum impregnation for the first time. The use of dried fruits as probiotic carriers is a new concept to produce a functional snack. Probiotic survival remains stable in the intermediate-moisture apricots during storage of 42 days at 4 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据