4.5 Article

Natural ingredient paeoniflorin could be a lead compound against white spot syndrome virus infection in Litopenaeus vannamei

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 349-359

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13561

关键词

antiviral; natural ingredient; paeoniflorin; WSSV

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paeoniflorin, a natural compound, shows significant anti-WSSV activity in shrimp aquaculture, providing protection against WSSV infection, increasing the expression of antimicrobial peptides in shrimp, and potentially inhibiting horizontal transmission of the virus.
White spot syndrome virus (WSSV) is an important pathogen causing high mortality in the shrimp industry in aquaculture, yet there is no treatment available to date. In order to find a treatment against WSSV infection, this study examined the anti-WSSV activity of eight natural compounds using shrimp larvae as a model. Among the eight compounds, paeoniflorin showed the most obvious anti-WSSV effect, with a maximum protection efficiency of WSSV-infected shrimp >60% at 100 mu M. Furthermore, pretreatment and post-treatment experiments revealed that paeoniflorin could prevent and treat WSSV infection in shrimp. The antiviral activity of paeoniflorin in aquaculture water decreased rapidly with time, and the results showed that the stable anti-WSSV activity of paeoniflorin could only remain in water for 1 day. Thus, the dosing pattern of continuous medication changes was evaluated. Obviously, in the model of continuous change of paeoniflorin, WSSV copy numbers in the virus-treated shrimp group still progressively increased, while the virus content in WSSVpaeoniflorin-treated group continued to decrease. Interestingly, paeoniflorin inhibited horizontal transmission of WSSV to a certain extent. Notably, paeoniflorin significantly increased the expression of antimicrobial peptides of shrimp to resist WSSV. In conclusion, paeoniflorin has the potential to protect shrimp against WSSV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据