4.5 Article

Aeromonas veronii virulence and adhesion attenuation mediated by the gene aodp

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 231-247

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13544

关键词

Aeromonas veronii; aodp gene; virulence

资金

  1. 13th Five-Year Science and Technology Research and Planning Project of Education Department of Jilin Province [JJKH20200353KJ]
  2. Youth Talent Promotion Project of Jilin Province [201905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study constructed a mutant strain to investigate the functional role of aodp gene in A. veronii TH0426, revealing that aodp deficiency leads to changes in growth rate, drug resistance, swimming ability, pathogenicity, and caspase activity of the bacterium. The down-regulation of 17 genes related to virulence due to aodp deficiency provides insights for further studies on the pathogenesis of A. veronii.
Aeromonas veronii (A. veronii) is an opportunistic pathogen of fish-human-livestock, which poses a threat to the development of aquaculture. Based on our previous studies on proteomics and genomics, we found out that the aodp gene may be related to the virulence of A. veronii TH0426. However, aodp gene encodes a hypothetical protein with an unknown function, and its role in A. veronii TH0426 is not clear. Here, we first constructed a mutant strain (o-aodp) to investigate the functional role of aodp in A. veronii TH0426. Compared with the wild strain A. veronii TH0426, the growth rate of strain o-aodp was slower and was resistant to neomycin and kanamycin, but sensitive to cephalexin. The swimming and swarming ability of o-aodp strain decreased, and the pathogenicity to mice decreased by 15.84-fold. Besides, the activity of caspase-3 in EPCs infected with o-aodp strain was 1.49-fold lower than that of the wild strain. We examined 20 factors closely related to A. veronii virulence, among them 17 genes were down-regulated as a result of aodp deficiency. This study laid a foundation for further studies on the pathogenesis of A. veronii.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据