4.7 Article

Modelling blue carbon farming opportunities at different spatial scales

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 301, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113813

关键词

Coastal wetlands; Blue carbon; Restoration projects; Additionality; Carbon markets; Tidal marshes and mangroves; Coastal blue carbon InVEST; Australia

资金

  1. Queensland Government
  2. Deakin University
  3. University of Queensland
  4. James Cook University
  5. CSIRO
  6. HSBC
  7. Qantas
  8. Australian Government Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources
  9. NQ Dry Tropics
  10. Great Barrier Reef Foundation
  11. ARC [LP160100492, LP160100242]
  12. Australian Government National Environment Science Program (Tropical Water Quality Hub)
  13. Greencollar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a growing interest in including blue carbon ecosystems in climate mitigation programs, with restoration and conservation identified as potential activities to increase carbon accumulation. This study estimated future net carbon sequestration in blue carbon ecosystems along Australia's Great Barrier Reef at different spatial scales and under different management scenarios. Results suggest that large scale restoration of tidal marshes could sequester a significant amount of CO(2)e, with regional and local projects showing promising carbon sequestration potential as well.
There is a growing interest in including blue carbon ecosystems (i.e., mangroves, tidal marshes and seagrasses) in climate mitigation programs in national and sub-national policies, with restoration and conservation of these ecosystems identified as potential activities to increase carbon accumulation through time. However, there is still a gap on the spatial scales needed to produce carbon offsets comparable with terrestrial or agricultural ecosystems. Here, we used the Coastal Blue Carbon InVEST 3.7.0 model to estimate future net carbon sequestration in blue carbon ecosystems along Australia's Great Barrier Reef (hereafter GBR) catchments, considering different management scenarios (i.e., reintroduction of tidal exchange through the removal of barriers, sea level rise, restoring low lying land) at three different spatial scales: whole GBR coastline, regional (14,000-16,300 ha), and local (335-370 ha) scales. The focus of the restoration (i.e., tidal marshes and/or mangroves) was dependent on data availability for each scenario. Furthermore, we also estimated the monetary value of carbon sequestration under each management scenario and spatial scale assessed in the study. We found that large scale restoration of tidal marshes could potentially sequester an additional similar to 800,000 tonnes of CO(2)e by 2045 (potentially generating AU$12 million based on the average Australia carbon price), with greater opportunities when sea level rise is accounted for in the modelling. Also, we found that regional and local projects would generate up to 23 tonnes CO(2)e ha(-1) by the end of the crediting period. Our results can guide future decisions in the blue carbon market and financing schemes, however, the return on investment is dependent on the carbon price and funding scheme available for project implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据