4.7 Article

Ecosystem carbon losses following a climate-induced mangrove mortality in Brazil

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113381

关键词

Climate change; Extreme climate events; Carbon stock; Soil organic carbon; Mangrove dieback

资金

  1. National Geographic Society [NGS-50638R-18]
  2. Brazilian Ministry of Science -CNPq [301412/2013-8, 470542/2013-6]
  3. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), JCNE Grant [FAPERJ E-26/202.757/2019]
  4. PELD CNPq graduate scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that drought events may cause mangrove mortality and release large amounts of carbon, contributing to climate change. In Southeast Brazil, the total ecosystem carbon stocks of pristine mangroves reach up to 1851 Mg of carbon per hectare, with a mortality event in the same estuary leading to a 14.6% decrease in carbon stocks.
Drought events may induce mangrove mortality and dieback events worldwide as a result of climate extremes. As mangroves sequester large quantities of carbon, quantifying the losses of these stocks following climate disturbances may guide wetland governance strategies globally. In Southeast Brazil, we determined the total ecosystem carbon stocks (TECS) of pristine mangroves that were up to 1851 Mg of carbon per hectare (Mg C ha(-1)), which are the highest stocks measured from South American and raising estimates of Brazil's mangrove TECS to 0.52 Pg C. A mangrove mortality event in the same estuary resulted in a 14.6 % decrease in TECS (270.5 Mg C ha(-1)) and loss of 20 % of mangrove soil carbon within less than 2-years. Carbon dioxide emissions from this impact were 992.8 Mg CO(2)e ha(-1), which are slightly lower than emissions from land use disturbances on mangroves worldwide. Our results suggest that climate effects on mangroves can become significant sources of greenhouse gases globally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据