4.2 Article

Fixed Bed Column Investigation for the Adsorption of 4-Nonylphenol Using Graphene Oxide Chitosan Aerogel Beads

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
卷 147, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001928

关键词

Graphene oxide; Aerogel; Chitosan; 4-Nonylphenol; Adsorption; Column study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the adsorption status of graphene oxide chitosan aerogel (GOCSA) beads for the removal of 4-nonylphenol (4-NP) from contaminated water was investigated using continuous fixed-bed column tests. The results showed better performance with higher bed depth, lower flow rate, and lower influent concentration of 4-NP, achieving a high adsorption capacity that is consistent with the Thomas and Yoon-Nelson models.
In the quest to find a nanoadsorbent for the removal of 4-nonylphenol (4-NP) from contaminated water, graphene oxide chitosan aerogel (GOCSA) beads were synthesized and characterized as a potential candidate in our earlier study in the batch system. In this study, the adsorption status of the nanocomposite was investigated using continuous fixed-bed column tests to determine the potential and performance of the adsorption. To evaluate the performance of the adsorbent, bed depth (10-20 cm), flow rate ( 10-20 L min(-1)), and concentration (1-3 mg L-1) of 4-NP were measured and the breakthrough curves for each condition were drawn. The column adsorption structure was found to operate better with higher bed depth, lower flow rate, and lower 4-NP influent concentration with 8.94 L breakthrough volume. The highest adsorption capacity of 18.53 mg g(-) 1 was achieved using 20 cm bed depth, 10 mLmin(- 1) flow rate, and 3 mg L- 1 influent 4-NP concentration. Finally, the parameters related to the Thomas, Adams-Bohart, and Yoon-Nelson models were calculated. It was found that the outcomes are consistent with the Thomas and Yoon-Nelson models. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据