4.7 Article

Simultaneous detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid based on vertical N-doped carbon nanosheets/three-dimensional porous carbon

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115850

关键词

Schiff base foam; Ascorbic acid; Dopamine; Uric acid; Electrochemical sensor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21765009, 21964010, 21465014, 21665012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A vertical N-doped carbon nanosheets/three-dimensional porous carbon (3D-KSC/C-CSBP) nanocomposite was successfully prepared and characterized in this study. The electrochemical sensor based on this nanocomposite showed excellent performance in simultaneously detecting AA, DA, and UA, with good stability, repeatability, and anti-interference ability.
A vertical N-doped carbon nanosheets/three-dimensional porous carbon (3D-KSC/C-CSBP) nanocomposite was prepared by carbonizing the Schiff base foam which was vertically grown on 3D-KSC. The Schiff base foam was generated by the condensation of aminaldehyde betweenp-benzaldehyde and hydrazine hydrate. The morphology and pore properties of 3D-KSC/C-CSBP were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, electron energy spectroscopy and nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm. Cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry were used to study the electrochemical behaviors of 3D-KSC/C-CSBP and its catalytic performance against ascorbic acid (AA), dopamine (DA) and uric acid (UA). The results show that the electrochemical sensor based on the 3D-KSC/C-CSBP nanocomposite can simultaneously detect AA, DA and UA without interference, and their linear ranges are 1.98 mM-6 mM for AA, 14.1 mu M-0.1 mM for DA and 0.45 mM-1.2 mM for UA. The detection limits are 0.66 mM for AA, 4.6 mu M for DA and 0.15 mM for UA. In addition, the sensor also has good stability, repeatability and anti-interference ability, which indicates a broad prospect in the future practical detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据