4.7 Article

Drop-coated molybdenum disulfide-ionic liquid for improving the electrochemical chiral recognition ability of chitosan

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115921

关键词

Improve; Electrochemical chiral recognition; Molybdenum disulfide-ionic liquid; Chitosan; Tryptophan; Potential differences

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0904104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel strategy to improve the enantiorecognition ability of chitosan using MoS2-IL nanocomposite was proposed. By optimizing various parameters, successful quantification of enantiomer excess in Trp mixtures was achieved.
A faithful strategy to significantly improve the enantiorecognition ability of chitosan (CS) is proposed via drop-coating molybdenum disulfide (MoS2)-ionic liquid (IL) nanocomposite. The present work describes a novel, simple, and effective chiral interface based on MoS2-IL/CS nanocomposite which was elaborately integrated to combine the electrical signal amplification and space complexity of MoS2-IL and vast enantiorecognition sites of CS for the electrochemical enantiorecognition of tryptophan (Trp) enantiomers. Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) was adopted to evaluate the potential differences (Delta EP) between the oxidation peaks of L-Trp and D-Trp. MoS2-IL/CS nanocomposite showed higher chiral recognition ability result from spatial asymmetry of MoS2-IL/CS. Herein, several parameters, such as drop-coated volume and concentration of MoS2-IL, electrodeposited viscosity, time and temperature of CS, detection temperature and pH were optimized in order to obtain a large Delta EP signal between L-Trp and D-Trp, and the Delta EP value can reach 53.3 mV under optimal conditions. Furthermore, different percentages of Trp mixtures and DPV peaks potential were detected with a good linear relationship even in the real sample, which indicated that MoS2-IL/CS chiral interface could effectively quantify the enantiomer excess (ee) of Trp enantiomers in Trp mixtures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据