4.6 Article

Suitability of Formulated Entomopathogenic Fungi Against Hibiscus Mealybug, Nipaecoccus viridis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), Deployed Within Mesh Covers Intended to Protect Citrus From Huanglongbing

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
卷 115, 期 1, 页码 212-223

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toab243

关键词

citrus; entomopathogenic fungi; exclusion; mealybug

资金

  1. Citrus Research and Development Foundation (CRDF) [20-002C]
  2. U.S. Department of Agriculture Current Research Information System (USDA CRIS) [FLA-CRC-005788]
  3. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) [027112]
  4. NIFA/USDA Multi-State Hatch Research Project [FLA-IRC-005729]
  5. Working Group on Improving Microbial Control of Arthropod Pests [S1070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesh exclusion bags are used to protect young citrus trees from Asian citrus psyllid and Huanglongbing disease. However, these bags can provide a micro-habitat for other insects such as Hibiscus mealybugs. In this study, the effectiveness of entomopathogenic fungi with and without insect growth regulators against Nipaecoccus viridis, a mealybug species, was evaluated. The results showed that formulated Beauveria bassiana-based products, alone or combined with an IGR, can effectively manage N. viridis populations on citrus trees protected with mesh exclusion bags.
Mesh exclusion bags are increasingly being adopted by Florida citrus growers to protect young citrus trees from Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, and Huanglongbing disease. These mesh bags exclude larger insects such as D. citri but may allow entry of minute insects. Hibiscus mealybugs, Nipaecoccus viridis (Newstead), have been observed thriving in the micro-habitat created by these covers on trees. Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) and insect growth regulators (IGRs) are effective against several mealybug species under various growing conditions, but their efficacy against N. viridis or within the microclimate within exclusion bags is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated various formulations of entomopathogenic fungi with and without IGR against N. viridis using laboratory bioassays. We then conducted semifield bioassays to determine effectiveness of EPF formulations alone and in combination with an IGR applied to citrus trees enveloped within mesh bags under field conditions. Survival probabilities of N. viridis nymphs exposed to all Beauveria bassiana-based products tested were comparable to malathion under laboratory conditions and reduced survival as compared to controls (water only). Under field conditions, mortality of N. viridis nymphs on leaves sprayed with each fungal formulation tested was significantly greater than on control treatments (Water, Suffoil X, 435 oil) up to four weeks post application. There were no differences in the colony forming units per leaf area amongst all fungal treatments. Formulated B. bassiana-based products applied alone or combined with an IGR should be effective tools for managing N. viridis populations on young citrus trees protected with mesh exclusion bags.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据