4.4 Article

The importance and impact of recognizing metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 33-43

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13071

关键词

chronic hepatitis C; concomitant liver disease; dual liver etiology; MAFLD; residual liver disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess the characteristics and outcomes of patients with a dual etiology liver disease. The study found that patients with CHC and concomitant MAFLD had more severe liver disease than those with viral hepatitis alone.
Objectives Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) can develop in any patient, including those with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The recently proposed diagnostic criteria for MAFLD provide a unique opportunity to investigate the impact of concomitant fatty liver in patients with another established cause for their liver disease. The objective of our study was to assess the characteristics and outcomes of patients with a dual etiology liver disease. Methods We evaluated 1181 patients including 744 with CHC and 437 with MAFLD. All patients in both cohorts underwent liver biopsy indicating disease activity and fibrosis stage. Results Nearly half (43.1%) the patients with CHC had concomitant MAFLD. Comparing patients with CHC alone with those with a dual etiology disease, we found that the latter had more severe liver injury, hepatic inflammation and fibrosis (all P < 0.001). Interestingly, lean or normal-weight patients with CHC and MAFLD had a similar fibrosis stage compared to the two other subgroups of MAFLD (obesity and/or diabetes mellitus). There was no statistical significance in hepatic steatosis and fibrosis between genotype 3 CHC and MAFLD group compared to other genotypes. Conclusions Patients with CHC and concomitant MAFLD had more severe liver disease than those with viral hepatitis alone. Recognizing coexisting MAFLD in patients with CHC is important for the delivery of holistic care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据