期刊
JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 725-732出版社
ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.10.012
关键词
Concentrated growth factor; Connective tissue graft; Coronally advanced tunnel technique; Digital measurement; Gingival recession
资金
- Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology [PKUSSNCT17B10]
This study compared the efficacy of concentrated growth factor (CGF) with connective tissue graft (CTG) combined with tunnel technique in treating multiple gingival recessions. The results showed better root coverage and gingival height, area, volume, and thickness increases in the CTG group, but lower pain scores in the CGF group.
Background/purpose: Research into biomaterial alternatives to connective tissue grafts (CTG) is a research hotspot. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of root coverage through tunnel technique with concentrated growth factor (CGF) vs CTG in treating multiple gingival recessions using digital measurements. Materials and methods: Seventy Cairo Class I multiple gingival recessions (in 28 patients) were treated with either CGF or CTG combined with coronally advanced tunnel technique. Digital models were obtained at baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months post-op to compare the gain in gingival height, area, volume, and thickness. Tooth sensitivity, post-operative pain, and healing index were also recorded. Results: Complete root coverage at 6 months post-op were 47.06% in the CGF group and 77.78% in the CTG groups. Mean root coverages were 80.55% and 96.18%, respectively. No statistical difference was demonstrated between the two groups in terms of gingival area gain at 2 weeks post-op, but the CTG group had greater increases in gingival height, area, volume, and thickness in the period after 2 weeks post-op. Pain scores were statistically significantly lower in the CGF group. At 6 months post-op, sensitivity scores decreased more significantly in the CTG group. Conclusion: Digital measurements revealed post-operative gingival shrinkage was more pronounced in the CGF group than in the CTG group when combined with coronally advanced tunnel technique. Despite the ease-of-use and minimal post-operative discomfort, it is difficult to achieve similar root coverage outcomes to CTG when using CGF alone in treating multiple gingival recessions. (C) 2021 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据