4.4 Article

Dependences of the hole mobility in the strained Si pMOSFET and gated Hall bars formed on SiGe/Si(110) on the channel direction and the strained Si thickness

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
卷 571, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2021.126246

关键词

A1; Planar defects; A3; Molecular beam epitaxy; B1; Germanium silicon alloys; B2; Semiconducting silicon; B3 Field effect transistors

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [18K04229]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K04229] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the dependence of hole mobility on channel direction and strained Si layer thickness in strained Si/relaxed SiGe/Si(110) heterostructures, revealing detailed transport properties of (110)-oriented pMOSFETs with significant anisotropy in hole mobility. The study highlights the [110] direction as preferable for hole mobility and the importance of having a sufficiently thin strained Si layer for high mobility, while considering the physical mechanisms of anisotropy and thickness dependence.
Strained Si/relaxed SiGe/Si(1 1 0) heterostructures are gaining interest as an attractive candidate for a Si-wafer based material for semiconductor devices with enhanced performances and lower power consumption, since a significant enhancement of the hole mobility has been demonstrated in this system. In this paper, dependences of the hole mobility on the channel direction and the strained Si layer thickness are discussed to reveal detailed transport properties of the (110)-oriented pMOSFETs. A significant anisotropy was found regarding the hole mobility, and the [ 110] direction was found to be a preferable channel direction regarding the hole mobility. Also, it was found that strained Si layer should be sufficiently thin to achieve a high mobility. The physical mechanisms of the anisotropy and the thickness dependence of the hole mobility are discussed by considering the configuration of defects and the valence band structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据