4.4 Article

Binding free energies for the SAMPL8 CB8 Drugs of Abuse challenge from umbrella sampling combined with Hamiltonian replica exchange

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-021-00439-w

关键词

SAMPL8; Umbrella sampling; Host-guest complex

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2075 -390740016]
  2. Ministerium fur Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Wurttemberg
  3. Stuttgart Center for Simulation Science (SimTech)
  4. High Performance and Cloud Computing Group at the Zentrum fur Datenverarbeitung of the University of Tubingen
  5. State of Baden-Wurttemberg through bwHPC
  6. DFG [INST 37/935-1 FUGG]
  7. National Institutes of Health [R01GM124270]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study employed umbrella sampling along a one-dimensional order parameter combined with Hamiltonian replica exchange to calculate the binding free energy of five guest molecules known to have affinity for cucurbit[8]uril. An empirical approach was proposed to correct for the overestimation of affinity by the GAFF force field, and subsequently applied to seven guest molecules in the Drugs of Abuse SAMPL8 challenge. While the systematic error decreased, quantitative agreement with experiment was only reached for a few compounds.
Umbrella sampling along a one-dimensional order parameter in combination with Hamiltonian replica exchange was employed to calculate the binding free energy of five guest molecules with known affinity to cucurbit[8]uril. A simple empirical approach correcting for the overestimation of the affinity by the GAFF force field was proposed and subsequently applied to the seven guest molecules of the Drugs of Abuse SAMPL8 challenge. Compared to the uncorrected binding free energies, the systematic error decreased but quantitative agreement with experiment was only reached for a few compounds. From a retrospective analysis a weak point of the correction term was identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据