4.4 Article

Tuning the quasi-harmonic treatment of crystalline ionic liquids within the density functional theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 448-456

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26804

关键词

basis set superposition error; computational uncertainty; density functional error; ionic liquids; molecular crystals; phonons; quasi-harmonic approximation

资金

  1. Grantova Agentura Ceske Republiky [19-04150Y]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports
  3. Czech Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Five ionic liquids were used to benchmark the performance of quasi-harmonic DFT calculations, with PBE-D3 combined with a triple-zeta GTO basis set often yielding the most accurate predictions. The error cancellation between basis set superposition and PBE imperfections strongly affects the overall accuracy, unlike B3LYP/GTO calculations, hindering systematic convergence towards higher accuracy.
Five ionic liquids are selected for benchmarking the performance of quasi-harmonic density functional theory (DFT) calculations of structural, phonon, and thermodynamic properties of their crystals. Data predicted by individual computational setups are sorted, establishing a distinct hierarchy among the first-principles approaches. PBE-D3 and B3LYP-D3 functionals are coupled with various plane wave and Gaussian-type orbital (GTO) basis sets. Propagation of the basis set superposition error and of the imperfections of both functionals into finite-temperature properties is discussed in detail. PBE-D3 together with a triple-zeta GTO basis set often yields the most accurate predictions of predicted molar volume and heat capacity with errors at 1% and 8%, respectively, representing the state-of-the-art for quasi-harmonic DFT calculations for crystalline ionic liquids. Fortuitous error cancellation between the basis-set superposition (overbinding) and PBE imperfection (overexpanding) strongly affects the overall accuracy, unlike the case of B3LYP/GTO calculations, impeding systematic convergence of the methodology towards higher accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据