4.7 Article

Computation of error bounds via generalized Gauss-Radau and Gauss-Lobatto rules

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2021.113604

关键词

Quadrature formula; Generalized Gauss-Radau formula; Generalized Gauss-Lobatto formula

资金

  1. Ministry of Scientific and Technological Development, Higher Education and Information Society of R. Srpska
  2. NSF [DMS-1729509]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper discusses the technique proposed by Golub and Meurant for computing error bounds for Stieltjes integrals, as well as an extension of this technique that addresses the situation where derivatives of the integrand change sign. By using different quadrature rules, upper and lower error bounds for the functional are effectively evaluated in such cases.
Many functionals of a large symmetric matrix of interest in science and engineering can be expressed as a Stieltjes integral with a measure supported on the real axis. These functionals can be approximated by quadrature rules. Golub and Meurant proposed a technique for computing upper and lower error bounds for Stieltjes integrals with integrands whose derivatives do not change sign on the convex hull of the support of the measure. This technique is based on evaluating pairs of a Gauss quadrature rule and a suitably chosen Gauss-Radau or Gauss-Lobatto quadrature rule. However, when derivatives of the integrand change sign on the convex hull of the support of the measure, this technique is not guaranteed to give upper and lower error bounds for the functional. We describe an extension of the technique by Golub and Meurant that yields upper and lower error bounds for the functional in situations when only some derivatives of the integrand do not change sign on the convex hull of the support of the measure. This extension is based on the use of pairs of Gauss, and suitable generalized Gauss-Radau or Gauss-Lobatto rules. New methods to evaluate generalized Gauss-Radau and Gauss-Lobatto rules also are described. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据