4.7 Article

Ice adhesion of PDMS surfaces with balanced elastic and water-repellent properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 608, 期 -, 页码 792-799

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.10.005

关键词

Low ice-adhesion; Elastic surface; PDMS; Water-repellence; Oil-infused surface

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that surface deformability is more important in reducing ice adhesion for ice phobic materials, while hydrophobicity is more crucial in tensile mode. Additionally, oil infusion can further decrease ice adhesion, leading to the identification of surfaces with super-low ice adhesion.
Hypothesis: Ice adhesion to rigid materials is reduced with low energy surfaces of high receding contact angles. However, their adhesion strength values are above the threshold value to be considered as ice phobic materials. Surface deformability is a promising route to further reduce ice adhesion. Experiments: In this work, we prepared elastomer surfaces with a wide range of elastic moduli and hydrophobicity degree and we measured their ice adhesion strength. Moreover, we also explored the deicing performance of oil-infused elastomeric surfaces. The ice adhesion was characterized by two detachment modes: tensile and shear. Findings: The variety of elastomeric surfaces allowed us to simultaneously analyze the ice adhesion dependence with deformability and contact angle hysteresis. We found that the impact of these properties depends on the detachment mode, being deformability more important in shear mode and hydrophobicity more relevant in tensile mode. In addition, oil infusion further reduces ice adhesion due to the interfacial slippage. From an optimal balance between deformability and hydrophobicity, we were able to identify surfaces with super-low ice adhesion. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据