4.7 Article

Low Frequency Dielectric and Optical Behavior on Physicochemical Properties of Hydroxyapatite/Cornstarch Composite

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 600, 期 -, 页码 187-198

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.158

关键词

Dielectric parameters; Optical properties; Crystallinity; Composite

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) [RACER/1/2019/STG07/UNIMAP/2]
  2. Ministry of Education Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between the physicochemical, optical and dielectric properties of HA/Cs composites, revealing that as the starch proportion increases, the crystallinity of the composites enhances while the optical properties decrease. The composite with 80% starch content demonstrates higher dielectric properties and is suitable for specific instrumentation designs.
An investigation on relationship among the physicochemical, optical and dielectric properties of the hydroxyapatite/cornstarch (HA/Cs) composites with the starch proportion of 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 wt% is presented in this work. The HA/Cs composites have been characterized via FTIR, XRD, DRS and impedance analyzer. This work depicts that the strong interaction is exhibited between the hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and starch as the starch proportion increases. This increment trend results in the higher crystallinity of the HA/Cs composites. The highly crystallized HA/Cs with hydroxyapatite nucleation center presents low optical properties (diffuse reflectance and optical band gap energy). The HA/ Cs composite with 80 wt% starch proportion (H2C8) show higher dielectric properties (dielectric constant, loss factor and conductivity) due to the stronger interfacial interaction and close-packed HA/Cs crystalline structure. The relationship among the physicochemical, optical and dielectric properties of the HA/Cs composite is studied in this work for potential of instrumentation design. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据