4.4 Article

Ferromagnetism in Undoped ZnS and Fe Doped ZnS Quantum Dots Synthesized using Polyethylene Glycol

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLUSTER SCIENCE
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 21-21

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10876-021-02196-0

关键词

Fe doped ZnS nanoparticles; Crystal structure; Bandgap; Single-phase; Ferromagnetism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural, optical, and magnetic properties of ZnS and Fe-doped ZnS quantum dots were investigated. The results showed that the Fe doping led to a decrease in crystallite size, an increase in lattice constant, a blue shift in bandgap, and a shift in emission spectrum from ultraviolet to violet.
ZnS and Fe doped ZnS quantum dots were synthesized by homogeneous chemical co-precipitation method using polyethylene glycol as a capping agent. The structural, optical, and magnetic properties of synthesized quantum dots were investigated using x-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible absorption spectroscopy, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and photoluminescence spectroscopy. The x-ray diffraction analysis confirmed the single-phase nature of the nanoparticles with the zinc-blend crystal structure. The average crystallite size was found to decrease with Fe dopant while the lattice constant increased. The mean particle size from the transmission electron microscopy image is found to decrease from 14.7 to 4.4 nm. The ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra shows the blue shift in the bandgap (5.0-5.96 eV) due to the quantum confinement effect. Fourier transform infrared spectra confirmed the formation of zinc sulfide and the substitution of Fe ion in it. The photoluminescence spectra reveal the shift from ultraviolet to violet emission. The vibrating sample magnetometer results depict that the zinc sulfide and Fe-doped zinc sulfides are ferromagnetic. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectrum also confirmed the ferromagnetic nature of zinc sulfide and Fe-doped zinc sulfide samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据