JC polyomavirus DNA detection in clinical practice

Background: There are limited data about the use and clinical value of JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) DNA detection in various clinical indications. Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of 410 patients from whom cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), plasma, urine, or tissue samples had been collected for JCPyV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) between 2012 and 2018. Results: JCPyV DNA was analyzed in 224 plasma, 190 CSF-, 32 urine and 10 tissue samples. 240 patients had a history of hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation, 159 had nephrological disease, 90 had hematologic malignancies, 58 had neurological disease, 37 had infectious disease and 23 had AIDS/HIV as underlying disease. Six patients had no underlying disease. The main reasons to take CSF or plasma samples were neurological symptoms of unknown etiology. Most urine samples were taken to monitor kidney transplantation patients. JCPyV DNA PCR contributed to the diagnosis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in eight patients (2.0%), of which seven had hematologic malignancy as an underlying disease. Conclusions: JCPyV PCR is most informative among immunosuppressed patients with neurologic symptoms. CSF and brain biopsy are useful when there is clinical suspicion of PML, whereas plasma samples are not useful. The value of plasma samples is a matter of dispute in the screening of JCPyV-associated nephropathy, as BK polyomavirus is the causative agent in most polyomavirus-associated nephmpathy cases. JCPyV detection is valuable in case the patient has past, current or planned treatment with immunosuppressive drugs.

Automated summary

JCPyV DNA detection is most valuable in the diagnosis of neurological symptoms in immunosuppressed patients, but the value of plasma samples is disputed in the screening of JCPyV-associated nephropathy.