Effectiveness of implant-supported fixed partial denture in patients with history of periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of implant-supported fixed partial denture (IS-FPD) in patients with history of periodontitis (HP) vs. patients with no history of periodontitis (NHP). Methods A literature search was performed on different databases on May 2020. Prospective and retrospective studies assessing survival (primary outcome), success and biological/mechanical complications of IS-FPDs in HP vs. NHP patients at >= 1 year after implant loading were evaluated. Meta-analyses were conducted by estimating hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect models. Results Of the initially identified 4096 articles, 349 underwent a full-text evaluation. Finally, 17 were included. Pooled data analyses showed that overall implant survival was significantly higher in the NHP than the HP group (HR = 2.06; 95% CI = 1.37-3.09; I-2 = 0%). This difference was noted when follow-up >= 5 years. The risk of peri-implantitis was higher in HP than NHP patients (RR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.31-8.3; I-2 = 0%), whereas the mean marginal bone level change over time was not different between the groups (SMD = -0.16 mm; 95% CI = -1.04-0.73; I-2 = 98%). Conclusions In partially edentulous patients receiving IS-FPDs, a history of periodontitis is associated with poorer survival rate and higher risk of peri-implantitis during a 5-10 years period after implant loading.

Automated summary

This systematic review found that patients with a history of periodontitis have lower survival rates and a higher risk of peri-implantitis after receiving implant-supported fixed partial dentures within 5-10 years.