4.7 Article

Inhibition of WEE1 Is Effective in TP53- and RAS-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial (FOCUS4-C) Comparing Adavosertib (AZD1775) With Active Monitoring

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 39, 期 33, 页码 3705-+

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.01435

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. MRC/NIHR Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) program
  2. CRUK
  3. AstraZeneca Ltd.
  4. Medical Research Council within UKRI [MC_UU_12023/20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the FOCUS4 trial, adavosertib showed potential as a well-tolerated therapy for RAS/TP53-mutant mCRC, with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to active monitoring (AM). However, there was no significant improvement in overall survival (OS), and the activity of adavosertib was higher in left-sided tumors compared to right-sided tumors. Further testing is needed in this population with unmet needs.
PURPOSE Outcomes in RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remain poor and patients have limited therapeutic options. Adavosertib is the first small-molecule inhibitor of WEE1 kinase. We hypothesized that aberrations in DNA replication seen in mCRC with both RAS and TP53 mutations would sensitize tumors to WEE1 inhibition. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed mCRC were registered into FOCUS4 and tested for TP53 and RAS mutations. Those with both mutations who were stable or responding after 16 weeks of chemotherapy were randomly assigned 2:1 between adavosertib and active monitoring (AM). Adavosertib (250 mg or 300 mg) was taken orally once on days 1-5 and days 8-12 of a 3-week cycle. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), with a target hazard ratio (HR) of 0.5 and 80% power with a one-sided 0.025 significance level. RESULTS FOCUS4-C was conducted between April 2017 and Mar 2020 during which time 718 patients were registered; 247 (34%) were RAS/TP53-mutant. Sixty-nine patients were randomly assigned from 25 UK hospitals (adavosertib = 44; AM = 25). Adavosertib was associated with a PFS improvement over AM (median 3.61 v 1.87 months; HR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.68; P=.0022). Overall survival (OS) was not improved with adavosertib versus AM (median 14.0 v 12.8 months; HR=0.92; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.94; P=.93). In prespecified subgroup analysis, adavosertib activity was greater in left-sided tumors (HR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.51), versus right-sided (HR 5 1.02; 95% CI, 0.41 to 2.56; interaction P=.043). Adavosertib was well-tolerated; grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (9%), nausea (5%), and neutropenia (7%). CONCLUSION In this phase II randomized trial, adavosertib improved PFS compared with AM and demonstrates potential as a well-tolerated therapy for RAS/TP53-mutant mCRC. Further testing is required in this sizable population of unmet need. (C) 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据