4.5 Article

Association between serum lactate dehydrogenase and 60-day mortality in Chinese Hakka patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A cohort study

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24049

关键词

acute myeloid leukemia (AML); lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); 60-day mortality

资金

  1. Health Commission of Jiangxi Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There was evidence in this study that serum LDH level is associated with 60-day mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially for those with LDH levels greater than or equal to 570U/L. The results suggest that LDH level is closely related to the prognosis of AML.
Background There is evidence that a high level of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is associated with poorer overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but its link to 60-day mortality of AML remains unclear. Methods All patients newly diagnosed with AML were included in this cohort study. LDH was measured for the first time after admission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the association between serum LDH and 60-day mortality. Interaction and stratified analyses were conducted including age, sex, albumin, glucose, myoglobin, and standard chemotherapy. Results Three hundred and seventy-one patients >= 15 years of age, who were newly diagnosed with AML, were consecutively selected. The total prevalence of 60-day mortality was 27.2% (101/371), while it was 32.1% (42/131) and higher than in the LDH >= 570U/L compared with the LDH<570U/L, with the prevalence of 24.6% (59/240); however, the difference was not statistically significant. In multivariate regression models, odd ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for Log(2) and twice limit of normal (ULN) of LDH were 1.46 (1.0, 2.14) and 2.76 (1.24, 6.16), respectively. Interaction analysis revealed no interactive role in the association between LDH concentration and 60-day mortality. Conclusions Serum LDH level was associated with 60-day mortality, especially for the patients with LDH >= 570U/L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据