Replicability in the context of systematic reviews: A call for a framework with considerations regarding duplication, overlap, and intentionality

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Replication Research Series-Paper 1: A concept analysis and meta-narrative review established a comprehensive theoretical definition of replication research to improve its use

Brigitte Vachon et al.

Summary: This study utilized concept analysis and metanarrative review methods to synthesize knowledge on replication research, resulting in the identification of three major definitions of replication and the formulation of a comprehensive theoretical definition. The study aimed to support the adoption of a shared understanding and recognition of the indispensable nature of replication research for the sound development of knowledge in all research fields.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Replication Research Series-Paper 2: Empirical research must be replicated before its findings can be trusted

Lex M. Bouter et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Letter Health Care Sciences & Services

Language restrictions in systematic reviews should not be imposed in the search strategy but in the eligibility criteria if necessary

Dawid Pieper et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence

Matthew J. Page et al.

Summary: The REPRISE project aims to explore transparency, reproducibility and replicability in systematic reviews of health, social, behavioural and educational interventions. It consists of four studies evaluating reporting completeness, surveying authors, independently reproducing meta-analyses, and crowdsourcing teams for replication. The project takes a systematic approach to improve future systematic reviews.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Mapping the discursive dimensions of the reproducibility crisis: A mixed methods analysis

Nicole C. Nelson et al.

Summary: The core themes of reproducibility discussions are the incentive structure of science, transparency of methods and data, and the need for reform in academic publishing. Additionally, three distinct clusters of discussion focus on reagents, statistical methods, and the heterogeneity of the natural world. There are discursive differences between scientific and popular articles, but no strong differences in how scientists and journalists write about the reproducibility crisis.

PLOS ONE (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Review Health Care Sciences & Services