4.7 Review

Vitamin D Supplementation and Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Controlled Trials

期刊

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab742

关键词

vitamin D; fractures; adults; umbrella review

资金

  1. Medical Practice Plan at the American University of Beirut Medical Center
  2. Office of Dietary Supplements of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [D43 TW009118]
  3. Fogarty International Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This umbrella review investigated the quality and discrepancies of systematic reviews/meta-analyses on vitamin D supplementation for fracture risk reduction in adults. The results show that vitamin D combined with calcium can reduce the risk of hip and any fractures, potentially driven by findings from institutionalized individuals. However, there are discrepancies in results due to different trial inclusion, search periods, eligibility criteria, and methodologies used. Individual participant data meta-analyses and subgroup analysis are recommended to further explore determinants for a beneficial response to supplementation.
Context The growing number of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MAs) on vitamin D (+/- calcium) for fracture prevention has led to contradictory guidelines. Objective This umbrella review aims to assess the quality and explore the reasons for the discrepancy of SR/MAs of trials on vitamin D supplementation for fracture risk reduction in adults. Methods We searched 4 databases (2010-2020), Epistemonikos, and references of included SRs/MAs, and we contacted experts in the field. We used A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) for quality assessment. We compared results and investigated reasons for discordance using matrices and subgroup analyses (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019129540). We included 13 SR/MAs on vitamin D and calcium (Ca/D) and 19 SR/MAs on vitamin D alone, compared to placebo/control. Results Only 2 from 10 SRs/MAs on Ca/D were of moderate quality. Ca/D reduced the risk of hip fractures in 8 of 12 SRs/MAs (relative risk [RR] 0.61-0.84), and any fractures in 7 of 11 SR/MAs (RR 0.74-0.95). No fracture risk reduction was noted in SRs/MAs exclusively evaluating community-dwelling individuals or in those on vitamin D alone compared to placebo/control. Discordance in results between SRs/MAs stems from inclusion of different trials, related to search periods and eligibility criteria, and varying methodology (using intention to treat, per-protocol, or complete case analysis from individual trials). Conclusion Ca/D reduces the risk of hip and any fractures, possibly driven by findings from institutionalized individuals. Individual participant data meta-analyses of patients on Ca/D with sufficient follow-up periods, and subgroup analyses, would unravel determinants for a beneficial response to supplementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据