4.7 Article

Ecosystem simulation and environmental impact analysis of transforming microalgae to produce jet fuel

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 333, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130100

关键词

Microalgae; HTL; Bio-oil; Heat integrated; LCA; Carbon footprint analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21838006, 21776159]
  2. Research Project of Shanxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology [202003D311001]
  3. Pires

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dunaliella salina, a fast-growing microalgae, can be converted into jet fuel with a high bio-oil yield using catalysts HTL method. Heat-integration optimization reduces energy consumption and environmental impact. Life cycle assessment confirms the importance of this system in wastewater treatment and carbon utilization.
Dunaliella salina is a fast-growing microalgae with excellent environmental adaptability but a low lipid content, which absorbed organics in wastewater. On basis of systematical data about previous work, an ecosystem model converting microalgae to jet fuel using catalysts HTL method is constructed, in which the bio-oil yield significantly increased to 49.09%. The heat-integration in separation section optimization reduced 46.1% of electricity and 63.4% of the heating energy, which reduced the impact categories of Acidification/Eutrophication and Fossil fuels, by 65.44% and 122.86%, respectively. Through life cycle assessment (LCA) of aqueous phase separation, the results showed that the impact categories of Acidification/Eutrophication, Climate change, Ecotoxicity and Ozone layer reduced by 18.87%, 18.14%, 17.72% and 18.31%, respectively. The system achieved the utilization of organic carbon in wastewater (40.92 kg C/100 kg dry microalgae), and also realized the fixed carbon (2.89 wt % of final product) from fossil energy carbon, which highlighted the importance of technological innovation for environmental protection and provided guidance on microalgae utilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据