4.7 Article

An optimized design for zero liquid discharge from coal chemical industry: A case study in China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 319, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128572

关键词

Zero liquid discharge; Coal chemical industry wastewater; Process design; Economic analysis; Minimum cost

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0705800]
  2. Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China [51808224]
  3. Shanghai Rising-Star Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a new design and optimization model for achieving Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) for coal chemical industry wastewater, aiming to reduce environmental impacts and minimize wastewater treatment costs.
Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) is an efficient solution for the issue of global water scarcity. To improve energy efficiency, existing units should be optimized treat coal chemical industry (CCI) wastewater. This study introduced a new design and optimization model for a CCI wastewater treatment approach that may achieve ZLD, as well as minimizing wastewater treatment costs. The model, considered treatment chemicals, flowrate, salinity, and operating pressure. Using different input conditions, the use of the ZLD system for CCI wastewater treatment was illustrated, and the respective mass balance diagram was developed. In addition, the economic cost of different units for each scenario involved in treating CCI wastewater was calculated. The levelized cost of water (LCOW) reached 1.325 $/m(3) when the salinity of input is 3000 mg/L. Furthermore, an environmental impact analysis was conducted on chemical, electricity, steam and solid waste for each technology in the ZLD system for treating CCI wastewater. This study presents an effective design and optimization process that could significantly screen CCI wastewater for the application of a ZLD process with the goal of reducing environmental impacts and minimizing the cost of wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据