4.7 Article

Introducing a low-cost jute activated carbon as a novel cleanup agent in multiclass pesticide residue analysis using gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 319, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128696

关键词

Jute activated carbon; Cleanup agent; Pesticide residue analysis; GC-MS/MS; Matrix effect; Graphitised carbon black

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study characterized jute activated carbon (JAC) for the first time and evaluated its effectiveness in cleaning up a mixture of 181 multiclass pesticide residues. Results showed that JAC had lower matrix effect and higher signal-to-noise ratio, as well as satisfactory pesticide recoveries in various food matrices. Compared to commercial GCB, JAC demonstrated superior cleanup effectiveness.
For the first time, jute activated carbon (JAC), a byproduct of the jute industry, was characterised and evaluated for its cleanup efficiency in a mixture of 181 multiclass pesticide residue testing using gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). Four commercially-important food matrices including okra, spinach, pomegranate and tea were chosen. Various physico-chemical techniques were used to characterise the material. The cleanup method involved dispersive solid phase extraction (dSPE) using a combination of JAC (5 mg) with 25 mg of primary secondary amine per mL of the sample extract (in ethyl acetate). The findings demonstrated a lower matrix effect and higher signal-to-noise ratio were recorded for JAC. Overall, the method offered satisfactory recoveries for most of the pesticides in all the tested matrices. The cleanup effectiveness of JAC showed superiority over the commercially available, non-renewable dSPE sorbent viz. graphitised carbon black (GCB). With a production cost of only US Dollar similar to 10/kg, JAC is a low-cost alternative to commercial GCB (cost = US Dollar 11-12/g). The study valorises the potential of JAC and anticipates its large-scale application in food testing laboratories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据