4.6 Article

Reciprocating free-flow isoelectric focusing with online array ultraviolet detector for process monitoring of protein separation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1663, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462747

关键词

Free-flow electrophoresis; Isoelectric focusing; Online array detection; Protein concentration and ultraviolet; detector

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31727801, 81774052, 22104082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An online array ultraviolet detection system was developed for real-time monitoring of protein fractions during Free-flow isoelectric focusing (FFIEF) process, showing good linearity and stability in experiments.
Free-flow isoelectric focusing (FFIEF) is a useful tool for separating and purifying proteins, DNA, cells, and organelles, etc. However, the online monitoring of each fraction during an FFIEF run has not been achieved yet, resulting in a lack of process monitoring of FFIEF. Herein, an online array ultraviolet (UV) detection system was developed for the easy assay of FFE fractions. The detector was integrated with an apparatus of FFIEF with 32 fractions to show the online monitoring, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) and lysozyme were chosen as the model proteins for manifesting the UV detector performance. The experiments revealed that (i) all the fluidic cells had good linearity from 0.03 to 10 mg/mL BSA and fair limits of detection (LODs) of 0.01 mg/mL; (ii) all the cells had good uniformity of UV absorbance; and (iii) the deviations of intra-day and inter-day of UV detector were respectively 3.8% and 5.8%, indicating the fair stability of the UV detector. The UV detector could be well used for the process monitoring of two model proteins through the whole FFIEF run, and the online absorbance assay of proteins at the end of FFIEF. The UV detector herein had the evident potential for rapid and convenient assay of protein fraction in FFIEF as well as other FFE modes. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据