4.5 Article

Thermochemistry of solution of methylpheophorbide a, dioxidine and their conjugate in chloroform from 298.15 K to 318.15 K

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
卷 164, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2021.106627

关键词

Chlorophyll photosensitizers; Chloroform; Dimethylformamide; Enthalpy and heat capacity of solution and transfer; Partial molar heat capacity

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-53-00038, 20-03-00153]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the thermochemistry and transfer of potential hydrophobic photosensitizers in different solvents, comparing their properties at different temperatures. The standard enthalpies, heat capacities, and partial molar heat capacities of these species were calculated from experimental data and compared with previous studies, highlighting the solvation characteristics of potential drugs in H-donor and H-acceptor media.
This paper focuses on the study of thermochemistry of solution and transfer of potential hydrophobic photosensitizers, viz. 9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-21-(methoxycarbonyl)-3-{(O-methylcarbamoyl)ethyl}-4,8,13,1 8-tetramethyl-20-oxo-phorbine (Methylpheophorbide a, comp. 1), [3-(hydroxymethyl)-1-oxido-4-oxo quinoxalin-4-ium-2-yl]methanol (Dioxidine, comp. 2) and their conjugate 9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-3-{[2-(3-hydroxymethyl)]-1-oxido-4-oxoquinoxalin-4-ium-2-methyleneoxy}carbamoyl}ethyl)-4,8,13,18-tetrame thyl-20-oxo-phorbine (Conjugate, comp. 3), in liquid chloroform (CHCl3) and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) between the temperatures of 298.15 K and 318.15 K. The standard enthalpies and heat capacities of solution as well as partial molar heat capacities of these species and some non-electrolytes modeling their side-chains have been computed from experimental enthalpies of solution and compared with previously reported quantities to highlight several important features of solvation of potential drugs in H-donor and H-acceptor media. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据