4.5 Article

Heat capacity and thermodynamic functions of transition metal ion (Cu2+, Fe2+, Mn2+) exchanged, partially dehydrated zeolite A (LTA)

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2021.106556

关键词

Zeolite A; LTA; Transition metal; Schottky anomaly; Coordination

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DESC0016446]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DEFG0297ER14749]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that cations in Cu2+ zeolite are in at least four distinct coordination environments, with some coordination environments in all three zeolites being highly asymmetric. The standard molar entropies are 71.8 J.K-1.mol-1 for Cu-zeolite A, 71.1 J.K-1.mol-1 for Fe-zeolite A, and 66.0 J.K-1.mol-1 for Mn-zeolite A at 298.15 K.
We have measured the heat capacity from 1.8 to 300 K of partially dehydrated zeolite A (LTA), fully exchanged with Cu2+, Fe2+ and Mn2+ ions. The samples have a broad excess heat capacity contribution centered around 4 K, which we attribute to local electric fields splitting the magnetic moments of the cations. The excess heat capacity is modelled using a sum of several Schottky anomalies. From these models, we conclude that the cations in the Cu2+ zeolite reside in at least four distinct coordination environments, and that some of the coordination environments in all three zeolites are highly asymmetric. We also report theoretical fits of the heat capacity data, and values of the standard thermodynamic functions C-p,C-m, Delta S-T(ok)m degrees, Delta H-T(ok)m degrees and Phi m degrees, at smooth temperatures. The standard molar entropies at 298.15 K are 71.8 J.K-1.mol(-1) for Cu-zeolite A (Cu0.22Al0.49Si0.51O2 center dot 1.04 H2O), 71.1 J.K-1.mol(-1) for Fe-zeolite A (Na0.01Fe0.23Al0.50Si0.51O2 center dot 0.77 H2O), and 66.0 J.K-1.mol(-1) for Mn-zeolite A (Mn-0.2 Al0.49Si0.50O2 center dot 0.53 H2O). (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据