4.7 Article

Hydration-controlled excited-state relaxation in protonated dopamine studied by cryogenic ion spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 155, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0066919

关键词

-

资金

  1. KAKENHI of JSPS [JP18H01938, JP20K20446, JP19K23624, JP20H00372]
  2. World Research Hub Initiatives in Tokyo Institute of Technology
  3. Cooperative Research Program of the Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices'' from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  4. RIKEN Pioneering Project, Fundamental Principles Underlying the Hierarchy of Matter: a Comprehensive Experimental Study''
  5. CNRS
  6. Region Ile-de-France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UV and IR spectra of protonated dopamine and its hydrated clusters were measured, showing different spectral features. Structure and excited state lifetime were determined through calculations, suggesting that water insertion inhibits excited state proton transfer.
Ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) spectra of protonated dopamine (DAH(+)) and its hydrated clusters DAH(+)(H2O)(1-3) are measured by cryogenic ion spectroscopy. DAH(+) monomer and hydrated clusters with up to two water molecules show a broad UV spectrum, while it turns to a sharp, well-resolved one for DAH(+)-(H2O)(3). Excited state calculations of DAH(+)(H2O)(3) reproduce these spectral features. The conformer-selected IR spectrum of DAH(+)(H2O)(3) is measured by IR dip spectroscopy, and its structure is assigned with the help of quantum chemical calculations. The excited state lifetime of DAH(+) is much shorter than 20 ps, the cross correlation of the ps lasers, revealing a fast relaxation dynamics. The minimal energy path along the NH -> pi proton transfer coordinate exhibits a low energy barrier in the monomer, while this path is blocked by the high energy barrier in DAH(+)(H2O)(3). It is concluded that the excited state proton transfer in DAH(+) is inhibited by water-insertion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据