4.7 Article

Multicomponent heat-bath configuration interaction with the perturbative correction for the calculation of protonic excited states

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 155, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0076006

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Missouri-Columbia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the multicomponent HCI method is extended to excited states with the implementation of second-order Epstein-Nesbet correction and a new procedure using the FGH method for calculating reference excitation energies. Benchmarking with protonic excitations of HCN and FHF- molecules shows that the excited-state multicomponent HCI method achieves similar accuracy to previous methods.
In this study, we extend the multicomponent heat-bath configuration interaction (HCI) method to excited states. Previous multicomponent HCI studies have been performed using only the variational stage of the HCI algorithm as they have largely focused on the calculation of protonic densities. Because this study focuses on energetic quantities, a second-order perturbative correction after the variational stage is essential. Therefore, this study implements the second-order Epstein-Nesbet correction to the variational stage of multicomponent HCI for the first time. Additionally, this study introduces a new procedure for calculating reference excitation energies for multicomponent methods using the Fourier-grid Hamiltonian (FGH) method, which should allow the one-particle electronic basis set errors to be better isolated from errors arising from an incomplete description of electron-proton correlation. The excited-state multicomponent HCI method is benchmarked by computing protonic excitations of the HCN and FHF- molecules and is shown to be of similar accuracy to previous excited-state multicomponent methods such as the multicomponent time-dependent density-functional theory and equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory relative to the new FGH reference values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据