4.7 Article

Controlling morphology in hybrid isotropic/patchy particle assemblies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 156, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0076914

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility, at the Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]
  2. NSF CAREER Award [DMR-1654325]
  3. NSF [OAC-1547580]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses Brownian dynamics to investigate self-assembly in a hybrid system of isotropic particles and anisotropic building blocks. By simulating annealing and analyzing structure characteristics, it is found that the resultant structures exhibit different symmetries and degrees of order for different size ratios.
Brownian dynamics is used to study self-assembly in a hybrid system of isotropic particles (IPs), combined with anisotropic building blocks that represent special designer particles. Those are modeled as spherical patchy particles (PPs) with binding only allowed between their patches and IPs. In this study, two types of PPs are considered: Octahedral PPs (Oh-PPs) and Square PPs (Sq-PPs), with octahedral and square arrangements of patches, respectively. The self-assembly is additionally facilitated by the simulated annealing procedure. The resultant structures are characterized by a combination of local correlations in cubatic ordering and a symmetry-specific variation of bond orientation order parameters (SymBOPs). By varying the PP/IP size ratio, we detected a sharp crossover between two distinct morphologies in both types of systems. High symmetry phases, NaCl crystal for Oh-PP and square lattice for Sq-PP, are observed for larger size ratios. For the smaller ones, the dominant morphologies are significantly different, e.g., Oh-PPs form a compact amorphous structure with predominantly face-to-face orientation of neighboring PPs. Unusually, for a morphology without a long-range order, it is still possible to identify well organized coherent clusters of this structure, thanks to the adoption of our SymBOP-based characterization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据