4.7 Article

Evaluation of Interactions between SARS-CoV-2 RBD and Full-Length ACE2 with Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01306

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0104302]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51832001, 61821002, 11572087, 21903002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coarse-grained models allow for the investigation of simulation system dynamics on a larger scale and longer time scale, making them suitable for studying macromolecular systems. In this work, coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations were performed to reveal the interaction details between SARS-CoV-2 RBD and ACE2. The results provide insights into the binding process and potential drug targets for combating SARS-CoV-2.
Compared to all-atom models, coarse-grained models enable the investigation of the dynamics of simulation systems on a much larger length scale and a longer time scale, which makes them suitable for studying macromolecular systems. Hence, in this work, we performed multiple mu s-scale Martini coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations to reveal the interaction details between SARS-CoV-2 RBD and full-length human ACE2. Besides, the key coarse-grained systems were backmapped into the corresponding all-atom system for the display of structural details. Our results indicated that the plier structure in two ends of the binding interface plays a key role in the binding process of SARS-CoV-2 RBD with ACE2. Furthermore, we also found that when there is no B0AT1 in the simulation system, the N-terminus of ACE2 is more likely to approach the cell membrane, which has a strong correlation with the subsequent fusion of the virus with the cell membrane. These binding details of SARS-CoV-2 RBD and the ACE2 protease domain (PD) as well as the membrane orientation thermodynamics can promote the development of therapeutic drugs and preventive vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据